On Mon, 12 May 2008 09:33:47 +0200, "Thomas de Groot"
<t.d### [at] internlDOTnet> wrote:

>
>What I have done sometimes, and if some repetition is not too obvious in the 
>final image, is to mirror a height_field along x or z (or both, according to 
>need). The seam is absolutely invisible.

That was my second thought Thomas but my scripting skills are somewhat
lacking. I am using a #while loop and the mirrored HF are displaced.
In the morning (with a clearer head I might be able to do it properly
using a local transformation. My first thought was to use a function
like:
   height_field {
      function 100, 100 {pattern {spotted scale 0.3 rotate -90*x}}
smooth
      scale <30,5,30>
   }

Which should define a height field in 3D space but I cannot find
enough information in the documentation to enable me to do it
properly. Again poor scripting skills. Alas alack, the curse of using
a modeller :-(
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message